Popular search terms
  • Biosecurity toolkit
  • Contact us
  • What is biosecurity?
  • Farm Biosecurity Program
  • Plant pest responses
  • Animal disease response
  • Farm profiler
  • Toolkit
  • Subscribe
  • About
    • About the Farm Biosecurity Program
    • Emergency animal disease responses
    • Emergency plant pest responses
  • Essentials
    • Farm inputs
    • Farm outputs
    • Ferals & weeds
      • Wild dog biosecurity
    • People, vehicles & equipment
    • Production practices
    • Train, plan & record
    • Videos
  • Toolkit
    • Gate sign
    • Create your own biosecurity kit
    • Declarations
    • Manuals
    • On-farm biosecurity planning
    • Records
  • Crops
    • Cotton
      • Cotton best management practice
      • Cotton product management
      • Cotton pests
    • Feed mills
    • Fruit & nuts
      • Fruit & nut pests
        • Apple and pear pests
        • Avocado pests
        • Banana pests
        • Cherry pests
        • Citrus pests
        • Mango pests
        • Nut pests
        • Papaya pests
        • Summerfruit pests
      • Fruit & nut product management
    • Grains
      • Grains pests
      • Grains product management
      • Grain storage options
    • Honey bees
      • BeeAware website and newsletter
      • Code of Practice and National Bee Biosecurity Program
      • Honey bee glossary
      • Honey bee product management
      • Honey bee pests
      • Honey bee best management practice
      • Beekeeper advisory – mosquito insecticide control during the 2022 Japanese encephalitis outbreak
    • Nursery & garden
      • Nursery & garden pests
      • Nursery & garden product management
      • Nursery & garden best management practice
    • Onions
      • Onion pest threats
      • Onion pest eradication or control examples
    • Plantation forestry
      • Forestry biosecurity practices
      • Forestry pests
      • Hypothetical exotic bark beetle incursion
      • Plantation forestry quality assurance
    • Potatoes
      • Potato pest threats
      • Potato biosecurity areas
    • Sugarcane
      • Sugarcane best management practice
      • Sugarcane biosecurity essentials
      • Queensland Sugarcane Biosecurity Zones
      • Sugarcane pests and weeds
    • Vegetables
      • Vegetable pests
      • Vegetable product management
    • Viticulture
      • Phylloxera
      • Viticulture pests
      • Viticulture product management
  • Livestock
    • Alpacas
    • Beef cattle
    • Chickens
    • Dairy cattle
    • Ducks
    • Eggs
    • Feed mills
    • Goats
    • Horses
      • Mosquito Management for Horses
    • Lot feeding
    • New and emerging livestock industries
    • Pigs
      • Feeding your pigs
      • Controlling mosquitoes around piggeries
    • Ratites
    • Sheep
    • Zoo animals
  • Get help
    • Property biosecurity management planning
  • News
    • E-newsletter
    • Subscribe to Farm Biosecurity News
  • Stories
  • Videos

Chemical residues in crops could harm safe grain status

Print this page
  • Home
  • News
  • Chemical residues in crops could harm safe grain status

Chemical residues in crops could harm safe grain status

Australian grain has a healthy export market, accounting for 16 per cent of the country’s agricultural export income. Grain quality and stringent measures across the value chain to ensure it is safe to consume help facilitate access to key export markets.

The Australian Government’s National Residue Survey (NRS) is one of the systems employed to manage the risk of chemical residue and environmental contaminants in food products. The NRS tests for residues of pesticides and environmental contaminants in 21 grains, pulses and oilseeds.

In the event of harmful residues being detected, the Australian grains industry could jeopardise the health of people, animals and the environment, and risk access to export markets.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) sets maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in agricultural produce, particularly produce entering the food chain.

Regular testing of grains through the NRS also demonstrates a high level of compliance of the MRLs. In many cases this is well above 99.5 per cent.

Any detection above an importing country’s MRL limits can have significant consequences for the grain industry, which can include:

  • penalties against the exporter or grower
  • banning of chemicals
  • rejection of shipment or further shipments
  • increased testing regimes by importing countries
  • demurrage costs that can exceed tens of thousands of dollars
  • downgrading the product.

What are harmful residues?

A residue is what remains of a chemical or heavy metal (for example, lead, arsenic or cadmium) inside a plant at a point in time. The residue could be the original substance or a derivative (metabolite) of the original substance. All chemicals and heavy metals cause residue, but the time taken for a residue to break down varies depending on the substance and the type of crop.

It may be harmful when the amount of residue in a crop exceeds the MRL for the chemical. The MRL is a legal limit and not a health level and is the maximum amount of a chemical residue allowed in a food or animal feed. A residue above the MRL usually indicates a misuse of the chemical and penalties could apply if produce is sold with a chemical residue exceeding the MRL.

How do harmful residues occur?

Residues above the MRL might occur when:

  • pesticide label instructions or permit directions are not followed
  • withholding period (WHP) of a pesticide is not observed (WHP is the number of days that must elapse between application of a pesticide and harvest, for example, windrowing of canola is the start of harvest, therefore the WHP must have lapsed prior to windrowing)
  • unregistered chemicals are used on crops – these chemicals do not have MRLs or WHPs and are an unknown residue risk
  • low-level cross-contamination could occur when clean harvested grain comes into contact with treated grain (for example, pickled seed) or fertiliser in storage or transport equipment.

What can growers do to avoid harmful residues in crops?

Keep crops free of harmful residues by:

  • following all pesticide label or permit directions
  • keeping records of pesticide applications
  • ensuring spray applicators are trained
  • observing the WHP, for both grazing and harvest
  • checking chemical application records before harvesting crops
  • prior to harvest, decontaminating treated grain storage, transport equipment or grain handling equipment and equipment that has been in contact with treated seed (pickled seed).
  • Always be aware of the chemicals used on a property and crops; keep crops and livestock safe from unnecessary chemical exposure or use; and help maintain Australia’s well-earned reputation for safe, grain products.

Farm hygiene and record keeping is important

Storage sites and handling equipment should be cleaned down thoroughly after using chemicals or fertilisers. This includes silos, augers, trucks and field bins that have been used to move or store fertiliser or treated grain (for example, pickled grain). One way to avoid contamination is to consider having dedicated equipment for fertilisers and treated seed on your farm.

The best way to clean most grain transport or storage equipment is by using compressed air, followed by water. Using a broom alone is unlikely to adequately remove dust and chemicals. Alternatively, compressed air alone can do a good job.

It is also important to ensure contractors who transport grain comply with the grain Carrier Code of Practice. Request a declaration of cleanliness, which requires the carrier to retain records of cleaning and prior loads that helps to determine the risk of chemical contamination.

Accurate record-keeping is always important and is particularly useful if grain is subject to a trace-back. Keep accurate records of all chemical and fertiliser applications to crops and pastures, chemical storage requirements, cleaning activities (for example, equipment, silos and harvest bins) and truck and trailer registrations of contractors delivering grain to market.

A single load of non-compliant grain can have a significant impact on export markets. Protecting Australia’s grain industry and maintaining a reputation as a reliable supplier of high-quality, safe grain requires the whole grain supply chain to be diligent about the use of chemicals.

For more information on pesticide residues or the NRS, access the GRDC Grain Market Access and Chemical Residues fact sheet, visit the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment’s website, or contact one of the Grains Biosecurity Officers in your region.

Acknowledgement: This article was originally published by the Grains Farm Biosecurity program.

Read the latest information on
Foot-and-mouth disease

Read the latest information on
Lumpy skin disease

Read the latest information on
Japanese encephalitis

Subscribe to our newsletter

Farm Biosecurity News

Use our profiler to make your

Biosecurity Toolkit

Latest News
  • 30 April 2025

    Silent invaders: what to watch out for this season
  • 28 April 2025

    The role of growers in the national biosecurity system
  • 28 April 2025

    Protecting Australia’s livestock: the critical role of the Ruminant Feed Ban
  • 28 April 2025

    Prevent, protect, and show with confidence
  • 31 March 2025

    Australia’s national biosecurity system: ready when it matters the most

Emergency Animal Disease Hotline
1800 675 888

Exotic Plant Pest Hotline
1800 084 881

  • Sitemap
  • Copyright
  • Contact us
  • Privacy & Disclaimer
  • Website by Morph Digital